» The Stone Roses - The Stone Roses
The Stone Roses - The Stone Roses Album
The Stone Roses - The Stone Roses Album
Performer: The Stone Roses
Title: The Stone Roses
Label: Silvertone Records
Country: UK
Released: Mar 1989
Style: Indie Rock
Cat: ORE CD 502
Rating: 4.6/5
Format: MP3, FLAC, WMA
FLAC size: 1272 mb | MP3 size: 2356 mb | WMA size: 1782 mb
Genre: Rock
Tracklist

1Elizabeth My Dear0:59
2I Wanna Be Adored4:52
3This Is The One4:58
4(Song For My) Sugar Spun Sister3:25
5Bye Bye Badman4:00
6She Bangs The Drums3:42
7Don't Stop
Producer – Schroeder, Garage Flower
5:17
8Made Of Stone4:10
9Waterfall4:37
10Shoot You Down4:10
11I Am The Resurrection8:12

Versions

CategoryArtistTitle (Format)LabelCategoryCountryYear
ORE LP 502The Stone Roses The Stone Roses ‎(LP, Album, Emb)Silvertone RecordsORE LP 502UK1989
88985434322The Stone Roses The Stone Roses ‎(CD, Album, RE, RM, S/Edition)Silvertone Records, Sony Music88985434322Australia2017
PMC 5062The Stone Roses The Stone Roses ‎(Cass, Album)Silvertone RecordsPMC 5062Indonesia1989
1184-2-JThe Stone Roses The Stone Roses ‎(CD, Album, Lon)Silvertone Records1184-2-JUS1989
1184-2-J, 1184-2-JX, 1184-2-JX REThe Stone Roses The Stone Roses ‎(CD, Album)Silvertone Records, Silvertone Records, Silvertone Records1184-2-J, 1184-2-JX, 1184-2-JX REAustralasia1989

Credits

  • BassGary Mounfield
  • Composed ByBrown, Squire
  • Drums, Backing VocalsReni
  • EngineerPaul Schroeder
  • GuitarJohn Squire
  • Photography ByIan T. Tilton, Simon Taylor
  • ProducerJohn Leckie (tracks: A1 to A3, A5, B1 to B6)
  • VocalsIan Brown
  • Written-ByIan Brown, John Squire
  • Artwork [Bye Bye Badman, Sugar, Waterfall Paintings]John Squire
  • BassGary Mounfield
  • Drums, Backing VocalsReni
  • EngineerPaul Schroeder
  • GuitarJohn Squire
  • Photography ByIan T. Tilton, Simon Taylor
  • ProducerJohn Leckie (tracks: 1 to 3, 5 to 11)
  • VocalsIan Brown
  • Written-ByIan Brown, John Squire

Notes

2006 remaster.This reissue has raised gold lettering the same as the UK first pressing.

℗ 2009 Silvertone Records Limited © 2014 Silvertone Records Limited.
Silvertone Records Limited is wholly owned by Sony Music Enterainment UK Limited.
Made in the EU.Paintings: John Squire Waterfall. Detail 1988 Oil On Canvas 30 x 26in
Front Cover Bye Bye Badman. Detail 1688 Oil On Canvas 31 x 26.5in
Sugar, Detail. 1988 Oil On Canvas 32 x 32in

℗ © 1989 Silvertone Records Ltd. Manufactured in Europe

Barcodes

  • Barcode (Text): 8 88430 41991 9
  • Barcode (Scanned): 888430419919
  • Label Code: LC12723
  • Rights Society: BIEM/GEMA
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A matrix label): 8843041991 A
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B matrix label): 8843041991 B
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A runout, stamped, variant 1): 100347E1/A A1
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B runout, stamped, variant 1): 100347E2/A B
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A runout, stamped, [Ⓜ etched], variant 2): 100347E1/A B Ⓜ
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B runout, stamped, [Ⓜ etched], variant 2): 100347E2 / B2 Ⓜ
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A runout, stamped, [Ⓜ etched], variant 3): 100347E1/B Ⓜ
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B runout, stamped, [Ⓜ etched], variant 3): 100347E2/B2 Ⓜ
  • Matrix / Runout (Side A runout, stamped, [Ⓜ etched], variant 4): 100347E1/B2
  • Matrix / Runout (Side B runout, stamped, [Ⓜ etched], variant 4): 100347E2/A6
  • Barcode (As Printed): 5 013705 116520
  • Barcode (Scanned): 5013705116520
  • Matrix / Runout (Mirrored - Variant 1): ORECD-502 21 MASTERED BY DADC AUSTRIA
  • Matrix / Runout (Mirrored - Variant 2): ORECD-502 21 A3 MASTERED BY DADC AUSTRIA
  • Matrix / Runout (Mirrored - Variant 3): ORECD-502 21 A5 MASTERED BY DADC AUSTRIA
  • Matrix / Runout (Mirrored - Variant 4): ORECD-502 21 A4 MASTERED BY DADC AUSTRIA
  • Barcode: 4 988017 663738

Companies

  • Phonographic Copyright (p) – Silvertone Records Ltd.
  • Copyright (c) – Silvertone Records Ltd.
  • Glass Mastered At – DADC Austria
  • Published By – Zomba Music Publishers Ltd.
  • Manufactured By – BMG Japan, Inc.
  • Record Company – BMG Japan, Inc.
  • Phonographic Copyright (p) – Silvertone Records Ltd.
  • Record Company – Sony Music Entertainment (UK) Ltd.
  • Distributed By – Sony Music Entertainment
  • Phonographic Copyright (p) – Silvertone Records Ltd.
  • Copyright (c) – Silvertone Records Ltd.
  • Published By – Imagem London Limited
  • Mastered At – Metropolis Mastering
  • Pressed By – GZ Digital Media – 100347E

Album

Stone Roses - The Stone Roses. Songs list. Listen online and stay in a good mood. MC-7 S 3 02655 4. Equally important was the Roses' cool, detached arrogance, which was personified by Ian Brown's nonchalant vocals. The Stone Roses - Don't Stop. Ian, John, Mani and Reni. Since the Stone Roses were the nominal leaders of Britain's Madchester scene - an indie rock phenomenon that fused guitar pop with drug-fueled rave and dance culture - it's rather ironic that their eponymous debut only hints at dance music. The avant-garde mood of the record is perfectly encapsulated by Squire in the album artwork as he blends Pollocks expressionism with references to the French situationist movement LemonTricolour in or. The Stone Roses - Don't Stop. The Stone Roses - I Am The Resurrection. The Stone Roses - Fool's Gold UK 7 single version. Jugoton, Silvertone Records, Jive. The Stone Roses is the debut studio album by English rock band the Stone Roses. The Stone Roses - She Bangs The Drums. Album: The Stone Roses 1989. The Stone Roses first album Released 2 May 1989 00:00 I Wanna Be Adored 04:49 She Bangs the Drums 08:39 Waterfall 13:18 Don't Stop 18:33 Bye Bye Badman 22:36. Ищете треки из альбома The Stone Roses исполнителя The Stone Roses Тогда заходите на наш сайт - слушайте музыку онлайн и скачивайте бесплатно. The Stone Roses - Made Of Stone. The Stone Roses - I Wanna Be Adored. Since the Stone Roses were the nominal leaders of Britain's Madchester scene - an indie rock phenomenon that fused guitar pop with drug-fueled rave and dance culture - it's rather ironic that their eponymous debut only hints at dance music. The Stone Roses - Bye Bye Badman. The Stone Roses - This Is The One. The album was then released in the United States on the 2nd of May 1989, following a release in Australia in December that year. The Stone Roses - Fool's Gold UK 7 single version. The Stone Roses - Song For My Sugar Spun Sister. It was then released on the 13th of March 1989 on the Silvertone music label. The record's critical standing also improved. Формируйте собственную коллекцию записей The Stone Roses. The Stone Roses - The Stone Roses. ZK 74139. Лента с персональными рекомендациями и музыкальными новинками, радио, подборки на любой вкус, удобное управление своей коллекцией. The eponymous debut album from The Stone Roses fused the acid house rave culture of Manchester during the late 80s with an irresistible jangle pop sound that captured the hearts of British ravers. Songs in album The Stone Roses - The Stone Roses 1989. The Stone Roses LP was recorded between June 1988 and Febuary 1989 by the Stone Roses with producer John Leckie. Продать эту версию. The Stone Roses first album Released 2 May 1989 00:00 I Wanna Be Adored 04:49 She Bangs the Drums 08:39 Waterfall 13:18 Don't Stop 18:33 Bye Bye Badman 22:36. Equally important was the Roses' cool, detached arrogance, which was personified by Ian Brown's nonchalant vocals. The record's critical standing also improved. You can stream and download Black Roses now at the following link 1K. Thematically, the album perpetuates ill feeling towards the Monarchy, Politicians and establishment in general. Most important - you can download the album The Stone Roses to your computer or phone absolutely free of charge, and without registration. In 2003, this album was ranked as the best album of all-time by UK publication NME. The Stone Roses - Waterfall. Black Roses is the latest track to be taken from Ian Browns forthcoming album 'Ripples' out Friday 1st February 2019. Download each separately, rating. The Stone Roses - Shoot You Down. The Stone Roses 1989 - download mp3 or listen online. The Stone Roses Cass, Album. The artwork for the album was inspired by American artist Jackson Pollock. What made the Stone Roses important was how they welcomed dance and pop together, treating them as if they were the same beast. Black Roses is the latest track to be taken from Ian Browns forthcoming album 'Ripples' out Friday 1st February 2019. It was recorded mostly at Battery Studios in London with producer John Leckie from June 1988 to February 1989 and released in May of that year by Silvertone Records. The Stone Roses

Video

Comments (50)
Iseared
MASTERPIECE
Innadril
I don’t know what the fuss is all about, saying that the quality of the pressing is poor. My one plays fine with no problems? As for the album itself, I believe it’s one of the finest examples of what music should sound like. ????????
Mala
My pressing sounds fine. It was a little dusty, but after a cleanup, no problems.To me it sounds good, I compared it to the 45rpm and the latter sounds better, but this one isn't bad at all.
Mbon
Not particularly noisy as some others have noted, but agree on the lack of dynamic range. The production album never sounded particularly good but I'm disappointed they didn't do more "remastering"
BroWelm
Sealed copy had lots of dust and after cleaning revealed lots of faint lines. Do they play them in the factory? Also not very good sq. Just got to turn it up and enjoy the music.
Erienan
My copy was sealed and sounds great, playing it on a Technics 1200 turntable with new Ortofon cartridge and stylus, maybe I was lucky, certainly not as bad as some people are making out, but I'm not an audiophile so what do I know.
Gerceytone
Sounds like its been copied direct from CD. Sounds lifeless with no dynamics. Lots of clicks, pops and surface noise.I've just played my 1988 45rpm single of Made of Stone and its sounds far superior. Looks like the original pressings and the 45rpm version are the way to go.
Nalmergas
Ordered new/sealed from Amazon US; this does not appear to be a UK-sourced pressing. There is something not right about this pressing. Like others, mine arrived with fingerprints and lots of dust and other manufacturing debris. The sound is not what I'd expect on a 180g remastered edition; rather, it sounds like a direct CD transfer (with lots of pops and other sound artifacts that don't belong).
Aloo
Mine is a great pressing, I guess i am lucky going by others comments. First time I have owned the vinyl and certainly an upgrade on my original CD
Ganthisc
As some here say this release is noisy, but listenable. Especially for the reasonable price I paid. If there wouldn't be noises it would be a really perfect pressing, because if nothing interrupts the sound is amazing. And even if there are some noises, it doesn't interrupt that much. Also there's more noises on side B, mostly on "This Is The One". At least for my copy.
you secret
I never bought a record that noisy. Try to send it back.
Uaha
I've have this pressing and had the 2015 double vinyl. While the 2015 pressing sounds more open, this one is not bad if you get one without any issues. It really should be on 2 LPs, but this one does the job as long as you're okay with turning up your stereo a bit and it is cheaper.
Flamekiller
Decent mastering, no surface noise . A pure pleasure to inhale... I mean to enjoy.
Arryar
bidding on a mispress on this on Ebay where the B side has U2 joshua tree label on it?! anybody seen one like this?
The Apotheoses of Lacspor
Just scored this from tescos.. Absolutely sound.. Perhaps some folk are just experiencing static?
Malarad
Crap pressing. Also it's using the new digital remix for some tracks, most noticeably "She Bangs The Drums" - absolute garbage.
Dibei
Vinyl (factory sealed) was filthy out of the sleeve. I cleaned it with Okki Nokki, which revealed scuffs and scratches. Also a big chunk on side of record, sharp enough to cut yourself. Lots of clicks and pops, sounds like VG+ with first play. Horrible press. It's a shame.
Kefrannan
That sucks man. Waste of a sweet LP. Got my copy back in the summer, 180g made in the UK, no issues. I hope your vinyl guy took it back.
Asher
Has anyone else got an off centre inner label? Looks like stevie wonder did it
Whitebinder
Picked this up as surprised to see it at my local supermarket - and my copy is just like what many users describe here - awful sound quality, loads of scratchy noises all over the place, the volume fluctuates wildly, and worst of all - it skips everywhere. Shame.
Cordantrius
There is nothing wrong with this pressing at all. It is dynamic, clean and quiet. I am not sure why some people state that this pressing is a crap. Maybe we are talking about different pressings.
Wild Python
Sounds great maybe the negative commenters got lemons (quite fitting with the album art)
Siramath
Sound is clean, no problems .. had a few unofficial ones of this.. they sound like ripped home casette tapes compared to this 2014 ,eu,180g issue
Pruster
Sounds awful, unlistenable. Treat yourself to the original 1989 pressing if you like this album..it sounds incredible. Bought it second hand for 35 pounds sterling (wouldn't normally spend anywhere near that on a second hand LP) - but it's worth it for the hours of joy you'll get - a masterpiece.
Dikus
What exactly is the problem with your copy that makes it awful and unlistenable? Is it the pressing or the remastering you find awful? The pressing of my copy is quite flawless.
Iaran
Don't know what happened to your copy. I've compared this side by side with an original version. Wasn't a lot in it sound quality wise. Reissue was a lot quieter background noise too although that's probably due to it being brand new.
Unde
Sounds good.. Love the little touch with a bold logo no the front, as the original..But be shure to read the instructions propperly, i did it all wrong and got my dick stuck in the curling iron
Shomeshet
Sounds grand no popping or clicking on mine no skipping or defects although it was dirty and a little scuffed, and I have to agree with another poster on here that it does sound a bit lifeless.
Samulkis
I was able to get a good deal on this pressing through the Amazon marketplace. Yes it's pretty noisy on both sides, but in terms of the mastering, I find this pressing isn't as terrible as the reviews here are making it out to be. Glad to have it in my collection, but I anticipate disappointment if you're paying above $20 US for it.
Barinirm
this is the worst vinyl i've ever had. total crap.
Gathris
Could you please enlighten us about why this is the worst vinyl you've had? What exactly is the problem? The music, the mastering or the pressing?
Vetibert
Bloody awful repress, save your pennies and buy an original , expect to pay upwards of £40, but when you hear it, you'll know where the exrta Money went
Xwnaydan
Have the original. It is not significantly better than this pressing. The new remaster is better though.
Gir
Picked this up for £7.99 in HMV today what a bargain!
Unh
No, definitely this repress. Same matrix nos etc. I don't know what half the people on Discogs are on about most of the time, I think they're all glue sniffers. Most of them don't even have an original to compare it against and in the case of this album, there's myriad of different presses from the original period anyway (I have at least 3, my brother has about ten) that vary in quality of press and thinness of vinyl etc. The original press was always a little quiet anyway and if you look into the recording of it, wasn't done with the biggest budget (which is why they did a remaster back in 2009 and changed various things in the mix - Reni's BVs being brought up, drums louder, generally sounding brighter etc. It's the same with MBV's loveless - The original was an awful pressing and hardly anyone has a copy to compare it against anyway, it's just a bunch of know nothing nerds wanting to sound like they know what they're on about listening on their shitty little record decks. I'd rather people talk about how good the album "is" rather than how it doesn't sound like the original blah blah. Anyway, yeah definitely this press and definitely a great sounding record of possibly one of the greatest debut albums made. Maybe they need a better deck, maybe their stylus needs cleaning, maybe the record needs cleaning, maybe they need some cotton buds. Maybe there's a % of presses out there with defects, maybe there's a different, earlier press with the same matrix. Maybe there's a batch pressed at a different plant (it happens, BoC had issues with the last lot of represses in France I think).
net rider
huh? How come everyone else is saying this is a dud?Were you guys lucky - or are you talking about a different repress perhaps?
Budar
Great pressing too.
Lamranilv
same buddy, an absolute bargain price for a stone cold classic.
Cordanara
Just going to confirm what everyone else here is saying; this is not a very good repress. Tons of surface noise and a somewhat lifeless sound, though still listenable. At least the artwork (& sleeve quality) is fantastic, I especially love the embossed letters. Probably still worth the $20 or whatever I spent on it, but this is one of my favorite albums so I had to have it.
Gaua
One of my favorite albums. However, this release sounds lifeless to me.
Cashoutmaster
Bought this brand new today from a high street store on opening i discovered a piece of vinyl dirtier than some of the £1 bargin bin stuff i pick up at my local market!!! Thankfully after a good clean the media plays fine but still has an annoying mark on side one
Mora
same happened to me!
Boyn
Mine is also a mess. Smudges and scuffs on side B. Really shit quality control on this repress.
Cesar
I don't believe this is remastered? It sounds just like the original '89 pressing and the quality is great.
Rrd
Mine had marks on side2 and a jump during She Bangs the Drums. Very annoying.
Phenade
Mine has finger prints and smudges all over it too. Shame really. I was hoping for a superb sound on 180g.
Briciraz
Ordered two records and both had gigantic scratches on Side B and finger prints all over the place. Disappointing to say the least. The Remaster actually sounds good on the undamaged parts though... so there's that.
Rleillin
Mine had giant finger prints on both sides :(
Thohelm
A bit noisy...
Uscavel
a lot noisy! Disappointed.